list_payments_applied_for_date_range

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states listing within a date range but omits details like pagination (top), ordering, authentication needs, or what constitutes 'payments-applied'. Minimal transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence efficiently states purpose and format. No wasted words, but could incorporate additional relevant info without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema (not shown), the description is insufficient for a list tool with date range and a 'top' parameter. Missing details on pagination, ordering, default behavior, and full parameter semantics. Many sibling tools exist, but no guidance to differentiate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds meaning to start_date and end_date by specifying YYYY-MM-DD format. However, it does not explain the 'top' parameter (likely pagination) leaving 1 of 3 parameters undocumented. Schema coverage is 0%, so description partially compensates but not fully.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it lists 'payments-applied' within a date range, with a specific verb (list), resource (payments-applied), and scope (date range). It distinguishes itself from siblings like 'list_payments_applied' which lacks the date filter.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives such as 'list_payments_applied' or 'list_payments_for_date_range'. The description does not mention prerequisites, exclusions, or context for usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.