get_invoice
Retrieve an invoice's details by providing its unique invoice ID.
Instructions
Get an invoice by ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| invoice_id | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Retrieve an invoice's details by providing its unique invoice ID.
Get an invoice by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| invoice_id | Yes |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as permissions, side effects, error handling, or response format beyond the basic retrieval.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise at one sentence, but it could include more useful details without becoming verbose. Still, it avoids unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite the presence of an output schema, the description lacks context about usage, such as what happens if the invoice is not found, required permissions, or any special behavior.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The parameter invoice_id is documented only by name and type in the schema; the description adds no meaning, such as format or source, despite 0% schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get an invoice by ID' clearly states the verb and resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools like list_invoices which retrieve multiple invoices.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like list_invoices or list_invoices_for_client. The description does not mention prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/RosenAdvertising/bill4time-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server