horizon_torn_getUserForumThreads

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must disclose behaviors. It only indicates a read operation ('Get') but fails to mention any side effects, required permissions, rate limits, or error conditions (e.g., invalid user ID).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence is concise but lacks essential context. Every word earns its place, but the description is too brief to be fully useful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 8 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description should provide more context (e.g., what 'threads' refers to, output format, time range meaning). The current description is insufficient for complete understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 88% (7 of 8 parameters have descriptions). The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate since schema handles most parameter meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description states 'Get threads for a specific player', which clearly identifies the verb and resource (threads for a player). It distinguishes from siblings like 'getForumThreads' (general forum threads) and 'getMyForumThreads' (own threads), but does not fully clarify the scope (e.g., forum threads vs. conversation threads).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'getForumThreads', 'getMyForumThreads', or 'getUserForumPosts'. Missing context about prerequisites or typical scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.