horizon_torn_getTornMedalsSpecific

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description is too brief to disclose any behavioral traits. It does not state whether the operation is read-only, requires authentication, or has side effects. The description carries the full burden but fails to provide necessary context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, making it concise. However, it lacks structure and fails to provide context or examples, which would help an AI agent use it effectively.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no output schema and a vague description, the context is incomplete. An agent unfamiliar with Torn game mechanics would not understand what medals are or how to use the tool effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so all parameters have descriptions in the input schema. The description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema provides, meeting the baseline of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get specific medals' is a verb+resource, stating the tool retrieves particular medals. However, it does not distinguish this from sibling tools like horizon_torn_getTornMedals, which might retrieve all medals. The purpose is clear but vague without context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Sibling tools include both a general medals endpoint and specific ones, but the description offers no selection criteria or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.