horizon_torn_getCompaniesSnapshot

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It only states it returns a CSV snapshot, but fails to mention any side effects (likely none), rate limits, data freshness, or authentication requirements beyond the API key parameter.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (one sentence) but lacks structure. It states the core function but does not front-load important details like the CSV format, optional parameter usage, or context for when to use the tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of an output schema, the description should clarify what the CSV contains (e.g., list of company IDs, names, statuses). It does not, and with 3 optional parameters, more guidance on their utility is needed for a complete understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (all three parameters have descriptions). The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, such as explaining how the parameters affect the snapshot (e.g., using timestamp to bypass cache). Baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it gets a daily companies snapshot in CSV format, distinguishing it from sibling tools like getCompaniesList or getCompaniesSearch that likely return different data structures (e.g., lists or search results). However, it could be more explicit about the snapshot's content scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus the many sibling company tools (e.g., getCompanyProfile, getCompanyEmployees). There is no mention of prerequisites, limitations, or alternatives, leaving the agent without decision support.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.