horizon_torn_getForumAllThreads

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description fails to disclose any behavioral traits such as authentication requirements, rate limits, pagination behavior, or side effects. It only states the basic purpose without addressing operational details, leaving the agent with insufficient information.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence, which is concise but somewhat terse. It front-loads the core purpose but omits potentially useful details like intended use cases or data scope. It could be improved without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of an output schema and 7 parameters, the description is insufficiently complete. It does not explain the return format, pagination (despite a 'limit' parameter), or how to use the timestamp parameters for caching. The description fails to fill gaps left by the schema and annotations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers 86% of parameters with descriptions, reducing the need for additional explanation. However, the description adds no parameter-specific context (e.g., the 'limit' parameter lacks description in schema, but the tool description does not compensate). Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves threads across all forum categories. It uses a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('threads across all forum categories'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like horizon_torn_getForumThread (specific thread) or horizon_torn_getForumCategories.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for broad retrieval of threads without category filtering. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like horizon_torn_getForumThreads (likely for a specific category) or other forum tools. No exclusions or alternative recommendations are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.