sub_page_configs_reorder

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. 'Reorder' implies changing order and likely persistence, but nothing is said about whether all config UUIDs must be provided, whether the operation replaces the entire ordering, or if there are side effects. This is a minimal mutation description with no behavioral detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no redundant words and the verb is front-loaded. It is very concise and structured well, though it sacrifices informational richness for brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with no output schema and no annotations, the description is not complete enough. It leaves critical operational details unspecified, such as whether the input must be the full ordered set or can be a partial reorder, and what the response/return behavior is. An agent invoking this tool would lack essential context about the semantics of 'reorder'.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already fully describes the single parameter 'uuids' as an 'Ordered array of config UUIDs', with 100% schema description coverage. The description adds no parameter-specific meaning beyond the schema, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear verb ('Reorder') and a specific resource ('subscription page configurations'), which distinguishes it from sibling tools like sub_page_configs_list, get, create, update, delete, and clone. It does not provide additional scope detail, but the action and target are unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention related operations like sub_page_configs_list/update/delete, nor does it clarify when a reorder is appropriate or what prerequisites exist. The description is purely the action, with no contextual cues.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.