sub_page_configs_delete

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. 'Delete' conveys that the operation is mutating, but it does not disclose permanence, cascading effects on subscriptions that reference the configuration, permissions required, or idempotency behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler. It is appropriately concise for a one-parameter delete operation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter delete, this is near the minimum viable level: the action and target are clear, and the parameter is fully documented. However, with no annotations and no output schema, the description omits destructive side effects and any return behavior, leaving the agent with only surface-level context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already documents the only parameter, uuid, with the description 'Config UUID,' and schema coverage is 100%. The tool description adds no parameter-level meaning beyond that, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the action ('Delete') and the resource ('a subscription page configuration'), so an agent can understand the tool's core function at a glance. It does not add much beyond expanding the tool name, and it does not explicitly distinguish among the sibling sub_page_configs_* operations, though the verb itself is distinctive.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given about when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as sub_page_configs_update, sub_page_configs_clone, or sub_page_configs_reorder. There are no prerequisites, exclusions, or notes about whether the configuration must be unused before deletion.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.