sub_page_configs_get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states 'Get' which implies a read operation, but does not disclose return format, error behavior (e.g., 404 when not found), or any side effects. This is minimal transparency for a retrieval tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, focused sentence that is front-loaded with the key action and resource. Every word contributes meaning, and there is no superfluous content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple get-by-UUID tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is mostly sufficient, but it lacks context about how this config differs from the similar subscriptions_get_subpage_config tool. An agent might select the wrong tool without additional disambiguation, reducing completeness slightly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with the uuid parameter already described as 'Config UUID'. The description adds no additional meaning or format details beyond this. The baseline of 3 is appropriate because the schema already handles the parameter semantics adequately.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'subscription page config' with the specific identifier 'by UUID', making the tool's purpose unambiguous. It distinguishes from sibling actions like list, create, update, delete, but does not differentiate from the similar-sounding subscriptions_get_subpage_config tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as subscriptions_get_subpage_config or when not to use it. The description offers no context about selection criteria, leaving the agent to infer that it is simply the config getter by UUID.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.