config_profiles_get_inbounds

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only says 'Get inbounds' with no mention of read-only nature, permissions, side effects, or what constitutes 'inbounds'. This is a significant gap for a tool with zero annotation coverage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single succinct sentence with no fluff. The action is front-loaded and the tool is simple, so the brevity is appropriate.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description does not clarify what 'inbounds' refers to in this context, what the output looks like, or any dependencies. With no output schema, it should at least hint at the return value. The lack of context makes it incomplete for an agent trying to use it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with the uuid parameter described as 'Config profile UUID'. The description adds no additional semantics beyond what the schema provides, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (Get) and resource (inbounds for a specific config profile). It is clear and distinct from config_profiles_get (which likely returns the profile itself) and inbounds_list (which returns all inbounds). However, it does not explicitly name or differentiate these siblings, so it stops short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like config_profiles_get or inbounds_list. The description doesn't mention any conditions, prerequisites, or exclusion criteria, leaving an agent to guess which getter to call.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.