restart_deployment

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description 'Reinicia un deployment' implies a stop-start sequence, but provides no additional behavioral details such as whether state is preserved, what permissions are required, or whether the action is reversible. Since no annotations are present, the description bears full responsibility for transparency and fails to deliver beyond the basic verb.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that communicates the core action without extraneous information. It is concise, but could potentially include more details without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one required parameter and no output schema, the description adequately states the action and required input. However, it lacks usage guidelines and behavioral context, leaving the agent with insufficient information to decide when and how to use it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers the single parameter deployment_name with a description. The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema already provides, so with 100% schema coverage, a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Reinicia' and the resource 'un deployment', making the tool's purpose immediately understandable. It differentiates from sibling tools like start_deployment or stop_deployment by using a distinct action.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as stop_deployment followed by start_deployment, or when a restart is appropriate compared to a simple stop or start. The description lacks any context about prerequisites or typical use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.