list_builds
List all builds in Komodo to view available build definitions and details.
Instructions
Lista todos los builds disponibles en Komodo
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List all builds in Komodo to view available build definitions and details.
Lista todos los builds disponibles en Komodo
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Description indicates a simple read operation, which is accurate. However, no annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as authentication requirements, rate limits, or output format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, concise and front-loaded. No unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple list tool with no parameters or output schema, the description adequately states the purpose. However, it could mention ordering or pagination behavior if applicable.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, and schema coverage is 100%. According to guidelines, baseline is 4 for zero parameters. Description adds no parameter info, which is acceptable.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states action (list) and resource (builds) with scope (all available). But it does not differentiate from sibling tools like list_deployments beyond the resource name.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool or alternatives. While it's implicit that it's for listing all builds, no mention of when to use get_build_info instead.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Nonetss/komodo-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server