delete_deployment

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It only states the action without revealing critical details such as whether deletion is permanent, what happens to associated data, or if it succeeds when the deployment is active. Essential behavioral context is missing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, using a single sentence to convey the core purpose. It is well-structured and avoids unnecessary verbiage, making it easy to parse quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite the simplicity of the tool (one parameter, no output schema), the description lacks important contextual information. It does not clarify the effect of the deletion, any error conditions, or what the response indicates. For a delete operation, more detail is needed to ensure correct usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides a description for the single parameter 'deployment_id' (ID del deployment a eliminar). The overall description adds no further semantic value. With 100% schema coverage, a score of 3 is appropriate as it meets the baseline but does not enhance understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'elimina' (delete) and the resource 'deployment'. It is not a tautology and effectively communicates the tool's primary function. While it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling deletion tools, the resource name inherently distinguishes it.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines are provided. The description does not specify when to use this tool, what prerequisites exist (e.g., stopping the deployment first), or when it would be inappropriate. Sibling tools like restart_deployment or stop_deployment are not mentioned as alternatives or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.