delete_alerter
Delete a Komodo alerter by providing its alerter ID to clean up alert configurations.
Instructions
Elimina un alerter de Komodo
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| alerter_id | Yes | ID del alerter a eliminar |
Delete a Komodo alerter by providing its alerter ID to clean up alert configurations.
Elimina un alerter de Komodo
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| alerter_id | Yes | ID del alerter a eliminar |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description should cover behavioral aspects, but it only states the deletion action. It does not disclose irreversibility, required permissions, cascading effects, or what the tool returns. This leaves significant unknowns for an agent.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence that efficiently conveys the primary purpose. It is front-loaded and avoids unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple deletion tool with no output schema, the description is too minimal. It lacks details on return values, error handling, and side effects, making it incomplete for reliable agent use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% (the parameter 'alerter_id' already describes its purpose). The tool description adds no additional parameter context, so it meets the baseline of 3.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Elimina') and the resource ('alerter'), matching the tool name and distinguishing from sibling delete tools for other resources. However, it does not explicitly mention deletion by ID, though the schema implies it.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like other delete_* tools. There is no mention of prerequisites, conditions, or when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Nonetss/komodo-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server