create_repo

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It states 'create' but does not mention side effects (e.g., does it create a remote repo on the provider?), authorization needs, rate limits, or potential errors. The mutation is implied but not detailed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with no wasted words. It front-loads the core action. However, it could benefit from including context without adding much length, such as indicating primary required parameters.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of the tool (6 parameters, 4 required, no output schema, no annotations), the description is insufficient. It lacks information about return values, error handling, and integration specifics with external git providers. A more complete description would explain what 'creates' means and what the result is.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, as all 6 parameters have descriptions. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema. Per guidelines, baseline is 3 for high coverage, and the description does not improve or detract from that baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Crea un nuevo repositorio en Komodo' clearly states the action (create) and resource (new repository in Komodo). It distinguishes from sibling tools like clone_repo, update_repo, delete_repo, etc., by specifying creation. However, it does not elaborate on what 'repository' entails—though context from parameters and siblings makes it a git repository.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like clone_repo or update_repo. There is no mention of prerequisites (e.g., need for a git account or Komodo setup), use cases, or exclusions. The description simply states the function without contextual advice.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.