obtener_secuencia_cero

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full behavioral burden. It implies a read, but says nothing about failure modes (e.g., what happens if zero-sequence data is undefined), whether it aggregates all three element types or requires selection, or the response shape.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with the resource and scope stated immediately and no filler. Efficient, though it is too short to front-load any context beyond the target object.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter getter with no output schema, the description names what is returned (the P2 zero-sequence record) but omits prerequisites and the format/units of the record. Adequate as a minimum, but leaves the agent guessing about preconditions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so there is nothing for the description to disambiguate; baseline 4 applies. The description adds no parameter claims that could conflict with the empty schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('Devuelve') and resource ('ficha P2 de secuencia cero'), and scopes it to fuente, líneas y transformadores, which distinguishes it from the definir_secuencia_cero_* siblings that write the same data. It stops short of naming those siblings explicitly, so it is clear but not fully differentiated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use guidance and no prerequisites: it never says whether zero-sequence data must first be defined via definir_secuencia_cero_fuente/linea/transformador, nor when an agent should retrieve this instead of those. Usage is only inferable from the verb.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.