ejecutar_perfiles_arranque_motores

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It conveys a scope boundary ('únicamente los puntos explícitos') but omits side effects, required permissions, mutation semantics, and return behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short sentence with no filler, so it is concise and front-loaded. However, it is under-specified for a tool with two nested object parameters, making the brevity a liability rather than efficient structure.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no annotations, no output schema, and 0% parameter description coverage, the description is insufficient for an agent to invoke the tool correctly. It does not explain the required nested inputs, what P13C profiles are, or what the tool returns.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are two required object parameters with 0% schema description coverage, and the description does not mention either 'manifest' or 'paquete_perfiles'. No meaning is added beyond the bare property names.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a verb (Resuelve) and a scope (puntos explícitos de los perfiles P13C), which is more than a tautology. However, 'P13C' is unexplained jargon and the description does not differentiate this tool from closely named siblings such as validar_perfiles_arranque_motores or ejecutar_secuencias_arranque_motores.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when-to-use guidance or alternatives are given. The word 'únicamente' hints at a limitation (only explicit points), but there is no instruction on when this tool should be selected over siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.