abrir_elemento

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It hints at resolving and synchronizing a persistent revision, which implies state mutation, but provides no details on permissions, side effects, reversibility, or what happens when the element is already open.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence with no wasted words, and the core action 'Abre un elemento' is front-loaded. However, the trailing clause 'resuelve y sincroniza la revisión persistente' is jargon-heavy and does not earn its place without further explanation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a state-changing tool with no annotations, no output schema, and an undocumented parameter, the description is far too sparse. It omits when to use it versus abrir_elemento_sin_resolver, parameter details, side effects, and what 'persistent revision' means in practice.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% for the single parameter nombre_elemento, so the description must compensate. It only implies that 'un elemento' is named, without explaining format, expected values, or constraints for the parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear verb and resource ("Abre un elemento") but leaves the resource vague—'elemento' is not defined among many element types. It adds 'resuelve y sincroniza la revisión persistente', which is unclear and does not differentiate this tool from the sibling abrir_elemento_sin_resolver.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use context is given. The description does not mention the alternative abrir_elemento_sin_resolver, nor does it state prerequisites or conditions under which this tool should be chosen over simply opening without resolving.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.