Runs static motor startup sequences in isolated contexts to simulate staged energization using manifest, profile, and sequence packages for OpenDSS networks.
Ejecuta las secuencias estáticas declaradas en contextos aislados.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| manifest | Yes | ||
| paquete_perfiles | Yes | ||
| paquete_secuencias | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v0.1.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are supplied, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It hints at isolated execution contexts, but does not state side effects, whether state is mutated, required permissions, return behavior, or safety profile for an execution tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The single sentence is front-loaded and contains no filler, but it is too terse for a tool with three complex required objects. The structure is clean yet insufficiently developed to guide invocation.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with three required object parameters, no annotations, no output schema, and 0% schema description coverage, the description is severely incomplete. It does not explain what the packages contain, what sequences are executed, or what the isolated contexts mean in practice.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are three required nested object parameters (manifest, paquete_perfiles, paquete_secuencias) with 0% schema description coverage, and the description does not mention or clarify any of them. The description therefore fails to compensate for the complete lack of parameter documentation.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description has a clear verb ('Ejecuta') and a nominal resource ('secuencias estáticas declaradas en contextos aislados'), but the purpose remains vague in domain terms and gives no differentiation from siblings such as ejecutar_perfiles_arranque_motores or validar_secuencias_arranque_motores.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No when-to-use guidance, prerequisites, or comparison to alternative tools is provided. The agent receives no signal about when this execution tool is preferred over validation or profile-execution siblings.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.