documents_pinned
List pinned documents in a collection by providing its ID, allowing you to quickly identify key files.
Instructions
List pinned documents in a collection.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| collectionId | Yes | Collection ID |
List pinned documents in a collection by providing its ID, allowing you to quickly identify key files.
List pinned documents in a collection.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| collectionId | Yes | Collection ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It only restates the list operation and does not disclose permissions, pagination, ordering, or response format. 'List' implies read-only, but additional behavioral context is absent.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, front-loaded sentence with no filler. Every word is meaningful and the structure is optimal for quick parsing.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool is simple, but with no output schema, the description should hint at return values or behavior. It doesn't, leaving some ambiguity. However, the name and schema make basic invocation clear.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema fully describes the only parameter (collectionId) with a clear description. The tool description adds no extra semantics beyond the schema, so the baseline 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific action ('List') and resource ('pinned documents in a collection'), clearly distinguishing it from siblings like documents_list and documents_starred. The scope is precise and unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to choose this tool over alternatives such as documents_list or documents_starred. There are no prerequisites, exclusions, or contextual tips.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/NikitaMurugov/yonote-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server