baker_set_udim_tile

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare this is a non-read-only, non-destructive, closed-world mutation, so safety context is already provided. The description adds that it targets one tile by index/name and references tileMode 2, but it does not describe side effects, permissions, or what happens to tile state when enabled/sized.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is a single front-loaded sentence with no wasted text. The essential action and identifier syntax are packed efficiently into one line.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema and annotations exist, so return format and safety context are partly covered elsewhere. However, for a 5-parameter baker mutation tool, the description omits the baker parameter, optional-field semantics, and when this should be used instead of other baker configuration tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must carry the explainer burden. It usefully clarifies that index can be a name like '1001', that width/height are sizing inputs, and that enabled controls tile activation, but it leaves the baker parameter unmentioned and does not document optional/null behavior.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action and resource: enabling and sizing one UDIM tile, with index/name as the identifier. It is clear what the tool does, though it does not explicitly differentiate itself from nearby baker_set_* tools such as baker_set_texture_set.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives a syntax example ('1001') and notes tileMode 2, but does not explain when to use this tool versus related baker tools. There are no prerequisites, exclusions, or alternative-selection guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.