pylon_delete_account
Delete a customer account from the Pylon platform by specifying its unique account ID.
Instructions
Delete an account
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The account ID to delete |
Delete a customer account from the Pylon platform by specifying its unique account ID.
Delete an account
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The account ID to delete |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must disclose side effects. It only states 'Delete an account' without mentioning irreversibility, cascading effects, permissions, or recovery options.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
At three words, it is extremely concise. While efficient, it could include a bit more context without becoming verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a destructive action with no output schema and no annotations, the description is too minimal. It lacks details on consequences, prerequisites, or entity type (e.g., 'Pylon account').
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Input schema has 1 parameter with its own description, achieving 100% schema description coverage. The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond that.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete an account' uses a specific verb ('Delete') and resource ('account'), clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like pylon_create_account, pylon_update_account, etc.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when or why to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., other delete tools like delete_contact, delete_issue). No prerequisites or context for deletion.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/JustinBeckwith/pylon-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server