Submit Product Page Review Item

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate destructiveHint=true but description does not explain any destructive side effects. Without elaboration, the agent may not understand the impact of submission. The action 'Submit to App Review' is described but behavioral traits beyond annotations are not disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence that efficiently conveys the core purpose without extraneous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool is a mutation (destructiveHint=true) with 3 undocumented parameters and no output schema, the description lacks essential context such as prerequisites, effects on existing reviews, and expected outcomes. The description is too brief to guide correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the tool description does not explain the parameters (appId, itemType, itemId). The description mentions the item types but does not clarify what appId or itemId represent or how to obtain them.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the action (submit) and the resource (Product Page Optimization experiment or custom product page version) to App Review. It distinguishes from sibling tools like asc_submit_app_store_version which handles app store version submissions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description implies usage for submitting product page items to review but does not explicitly state when to use this tool vs alternatives like asc_submit_app_store_version or asc_submit_beta_app_review. No when-not guidance provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.