Create Experiment Treatment Localization

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate a write operation (readOnlyHint=false) but no destructive effect. The description adds no extra behavioral context, such as whether the creation is reversible, what permissions are needed, or what happens to existing localizations. It only restates the creation action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise, but it omits critical information about parameters and behavior. Conciseness should not come at the cost of completeness; the sentence does not earn its place because it fails to add value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema, zero parameter documentation, and minimal behavioral disclosure, the description is insufficient for an agent to confidently invoke the tool. The agent cannot infer required inputs or expected outcomes.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain either 'treatmentId' or 'locale' parameters. The agent receives no semantic context beyond the raw schema fields (minLength constraints), making it difficult to know what values to provide.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Create a locale container for treatment screenshots and previews,' which clearly identifies the action (create) and the resource (locale container for treatment screenshots/previews). It differentiates from the sibling 'asc_create_experiment_treatment' by specifying 'localization,' so the purpose is clear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as creating a treatment itself or setting up screenshots in other ways. No prerequisites, exclusions, or context are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.