Create App Review Details

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description provides no behavioral details beyond annotations, such as whether it is idempotent, overwrites existing data, or requires specific permissions. Annotations indicate destructiveHint=false and readOnlyHint=false, but the description adds no context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence (13 words) that is front-loaded with the action and resource. However, it could be slightly expanded to cover key details without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 9 parameters and no output schema, the description is too sparse. It lacks explanation of return values, side effects, and parameter usage, leaving significant gaps for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema coverage, the description should clarify parameter meanings. It only broadly mentions 'contact information, optional demo account, and notes' without connecting to specific parameters like 'demoAccountRequired' or 'contactFirstName.'

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Create' and the resource 'App Review contact information, optional demo account, and notes for a version.' It distinguishes from siblings like 'asc_update_review_details' and 'asc_get_review_details' by specifying creation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when setting review details for a version, but lacks explicit guidance on when not to use it, prerequisites (e.g., version existence), or comparison with similar tools like 'asc_update_review_details.'

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.