Enable Phased Release

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description mentions 'enable' but the input schema includes states like INACTIVE, PAUSED, COMPLETE via the phasedReleaseState parameter, implying the tool can set non-active states. This mismatch reduces transparency. Annotations correctly indicate a write operation, but the description does not fully cover behavioral options.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise, but it omits critical details about parameters and behavior. It is not wasteful, but it is insufficiently informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema, low schema coverage, and two parameters including an enum, the description is incomplete. It does not explain return values, the effect of different states, or interaction with other tools, leaving significant gaps for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the parameters. It only implies versionId usage, ignoring the phasedReleaseState parameter and its enum values. The agent lacks necessary context for correct invocation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Enable' and resource 'phased release for an App Store version', and specifies a seven-day duration. However, it doesn't differentiate from sibling tools like asc_update_phased_release, which might be used for modifying an existing release.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as asc_update_phased_release or asc_release_app_store_version. The description lacks context about prerequisites or scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.