Search Roblox

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Since no annotations are provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It openly notes that results are tailored to a signed-in account rather than absolute, which is a useful caveat. It could go further by mentioning return format or pagination, but for a search operation the core behavior is effectively disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the primary action and resource, then adds use cases and an important caveat. Every sentence earns its place and there is no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a simple search tool with only two parameters and no output schema. The description explains the purpose, use cases, and the personalized-results caveat, which is sufficient for an agent to decide whether to invoke it. A description of result fields would add polish but is not essential for a search tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds 'by name or keyword' to clarify query semantics, but the schema already documents query and limit clearly. No additional parameter detail is necessary beyond what is provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool searches Roblox for games by name or keyword, which is a specific verb + resource. It also distinguishes itself by mentioning use cases like finding a game to add or comparing thumbnails, setting it apart from sibling tools like get_game_info.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives clear context for when to use the tool: finding a game to add or viewing comparable experiences' thumbnails. It does not explicitly mention alternatives or exclusions, but the use cases are concrete enough to guide an agent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.