list_resume_templates

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description carries the full burden. It correctly identifies the tool as read-only and lists preview information, but does not disclose whether authentication is required, if the list is cached, or any rate limits. For a simple read operation, the description is adequate but lacks additional behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence that efficiently communicates the purpose, scope, and key detail (preview information). No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (no parameters, no output schema), the description covers the essential information. It mentions the exact count and preview, which is sufficient for an agent to understand what this tool provides.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, and the schema coverage is 100%. According to the calibration rules, baseline for 0 parameters is 4. The description adds 'with preview information', which is a useful qualitative note beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('List'), the resource ('resume templates'), the exact count (37), and that it includes preview information. This efficiently distinguishes it from siblings like 'get_template_preview' (which shows one template) and 'list_resumes' (which likely lists user-created resumes).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'get_template_preview' or 'change_resume_template'. While the simple nature of the tool makes usage somewhat obvious, a brief note on its typical placement in a workflow (e.g., prior to selecting a template) would enhance clarity.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.