export_resume_json

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It does not disclose whether the export is non-destructive, what the output format's structure is, or if the data is returned directly or as a file download. 'Export' is ambiguous.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise (two sentences) and front-loads the primary action. However, it is slightly too brief, missing opportunities to add value within the same length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema, the description should clarify the return format (e.g., JSON object) and behavior. It fails to specify whether the export results in a file download or direct data, leaving the agent without complete context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers 100% of the parameter (resume_id) with its own description. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema's 'Resume ID to export', so it plateaus at the baseline of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Export resume data') and the format ('JSON'), which distinguishes it from sibling tools like export_resume_markdown. The verb 'Export' combined with the resource 'resume data' is specific.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions 'Useful for backups or integrations,' which implies use cases but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as export_resume_markdown or get_resume_pdf_url. No exclusions or comparisons are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.