get_okrs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It indicates a read operation via 'fetch' but does not mention auth requirements, rate limits, pagination, or that it is read-only/safe. The extra prefix '[Official API + UAT]' adds no behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that front-loads the primary action and scope. The '[Official API + UAT]' prefix is extraneous and reduces clarity slightly, but overall it is efficient and readable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description lists key response aspects (objectives, key results, progress, alignments) but lacks guidance on prerequisites (e.g., obtaining IDs) or alternatives. Given the absence of an output schema, it could be more complete but covers the tool's core purpose adequately.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage with descriptions for all three parameters (okr_ids, lang, user_id_type). The description itself adds little beyond mentioning 'batch' and listing response fields, so it meets the baseline but does not enhance parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool fetches full OKR details by IDs, using the specific verb 'fetch' and resource 'OKR details'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like list_user_okrs by emphasizing batch retrieval by explicit IDs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'by OKR IDs' implies the need to first obtain IDs (likely from list_user_okrs), providing an implicit usage condition. However, it does not explicitly mention alternatives or when not to use this tool, so guidance is only implied, not explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.