delete_okr_progress_record

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, leaving the description to carry full behavioral disclosure. The description does not mention whether deletion is permanent, if there are permission requirements, or what happens to associated data. This is a notable gap for a delete operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that front-loads the action and resource. The version bracket is brief and does not detract from clarity. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter delete tool, the description is adequate but not complete. Without annotations or an output schema, it omits important behavioral details such as irreversibility or expected response format, leaving the agent to infer these.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already documents progress_id with 100% coverage. The description adds a helpful pointer that the ID should come from list_okr_progress_records, but this is minimal extra value beyond the schema's basic field description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (Delete), the resource (OKR progress record), and the key (progress_id). It also references the source for the ID (list_okr_progress_records), distinguishing it from create/list siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context: the ID must come from list_okr_progress_records, implying the appropriate workflow. It does not explicitly exclude alternative sources or mention when not to use it, but the delete verb and ID reference make the usage context clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.