Skip to main content
Glama

Survey Binary

survey_binary

Get a high-level overview of a binary's metadata, entity counts, segments, and entry points to quickly understand its structure before deeper reverse engineering.

Instructions

High-level binary overview: metadata, entity counts, segments, entry points.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "survey_binary"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
timeoutNoTimeout in seconds
instance_idNoREQUIRED whenever more than one database is open (from open_database's result or list_databases()); optional only while exactly one instance is live.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.0.1
    • changedInput schema / properties / instance_id / description
      Previous value: -"Instance id override"New value: +"REQUIRED whenever more than one database is open (from open_database's result or list_databases()); optional only while exactly one instance is live."
  2. First observedv0.9.7

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden and discloses almost nothing: it does not say the operation is read-only, that it requires an open database, whether it triggers analysis, or how large/expensive the response is. Only the schema's instance_id text hints at the single-instance precondition.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with no filler. Its brevity is somewhat at the expense of usefulness, but structurally it is clean and waste-free.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An aggregating survey tool with no output schema needs to say roughly what comes back and how it relates to the narrower list/get tools. The description leaves an agent unable to judge payload size, cost, or whether calling it subsumes several sibling calls.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%; timeout and instance_id are both documented in the schema, including the multi-database rule. The description adds no additional parameter meaning, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb+resource: a high-level overview of the loaded binary, and enumerates what it covers (metadata, entity counts, segments, entry points). It is clear on its own, but it does not distinguish itself from siblings such as get_metadata, list_segments, get_entry_points, or list_functions, which cover the same ground individually.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to call this instead of the focused tools it duplicates (get_metadata, list_segments, get_entry_points). No prerequisites, no notes on cost or when a broad survey is preferable to targeted queries.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.