No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 91 tools
Most tools target clearly distinct IDA operations, especially with separate namespaces for database lifecycle, analysis, xrefs, types, patching, and debugging. However, save_database and save_idb are exact duplicates, dbg_regs/dbg_thread_regs overlap, and the signature-creation family plus apply_patch/patch_bytes require careful reading to choose correctly.
All names are snake_case, which helps, but the naming style is mixed: many verb_noun names, many bare verbs like disasm/decompile, noun names like callgraph/stack_frame/survey_binary, a dbg_ prefix for debugger tools, and xrefs_to/xrefs_from directional names. The set is readable but does not follow one predictable pattern.
With 91 tools, the surface is far beyond a reasonably scoped server and imposes high selection burden on an agent. Even though many tools are useful, the count is extreme for the apparent domain and includes duplicates and fine-grained variants that could be consolidated.
The surface is very comprehensive for IDA reverse engineering: database management, analysis, disassembly/decompilation, xrefs, functions, types, segments, strings, patching, signatures, debugging, and Python execution are all covered. Minor gaps exist around local-type deletion and richer per-function detail aggregation, but core workflows are well supported.