Skip to main content
Glama

Dbg Continue

dbg_continue

Resume a paused IDA Pro debugging session by continuing program execution, with optional timeout and instance selection for multi-instance analysis.

Instructions

Continue execution.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "dbg_continue"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
timeoutNoTimeout in seconds
instance_idNoREQUIRED whenever more than one database is open (from open_database's result or list_databases()); optional only while exactly one instance is live.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.0.1
    • changedInput schema / properties / instance_id / description
      Previous value: -"Instance id override"New value: +"REQUIRED whenever more than one database is open (from open_database's result or list_databases()); optional only while exactly one instance is live."
  2. First observedv0.9.7

TDQS

C2.1/5.0
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden, and it discloses nothing. It does not say whether the call blocks until the next breakpoint/exit, how the timeout parameter changes that behavior, what happens if the process is already running or dead, or what state it returns in.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two words, front-loaded, with zero waste — but the brevity stems from under-specification rather than disciplined editing. There is no structure to speak of because there is no content to structure.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a debugger control-flow tool with no annotations and no output schema, the agent needs to know blocking/concurrency semantics and post-call state; none of that is present. The well-documented parameters partially compensate but do not cover the execution behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%: both timeout and the multi-instance constraint on instance_id are fully documented in the schema. The description adds no meaning beyond the schema, so the baseline 3 applies rather than a penalty.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

"Continue execution." essentially restates the name and title (dbg_continue / Dbg Continue) without specifying what execution is resumed or in what state the debuggee must be. It does not distinguish this from nearby siblings like dbg_step_over, dbg_run_to, or dbg_start.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no statement of when to use this versus dbg_step_into, dbg_step_over, dbg_run_to, or dbg_exit. Only a weak implied usage: 'continue' conventionally means resume a paused debuggee, which an agent must already know from general debugging vocabulary.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.