Skip to main content
Glama

Dbg Run To

dbg_run_to

Run the debugger to a specified address, with optional timeout and instance selection for multi-database setups.

Instructions

Run debugger to specific address.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "addr": "<addr>"
    },
    "name": "dbg_run_to"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
addrYesTarget address to run to
timeoutNoTimeout in seconds
instance_idNoREQUIRED whenever more than one database is open (from open_database's result or list_databases()); optional only while exactly one instance is live.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.0.1
    • changedInput schema / properties / instance_id / description
      Previous value: -"Instance id override"New value: +"REQUIRED whenever more than one database is open (from open_database's result or list_databases()); optional only while exactly one instance is live."
  2. First observedv0.9.7

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden but discloses nothing behavioral: it does not say whether execution blocks until the address is reached, what happens on timeout, whether breakpoints encountered en route stop execution, or what state is left behind. For a tool that resumes process execution this is a substantial gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with no filler. Its brevity is not padded, though it borders on under-specification rather than deliberate economy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

A debugger-control tool with execution side effects, three parameters, no annotations, and no output schema requires more than one sentence. Missing: session prerequisites, blocking/timeout semantics, return value (final stop reason or location), and interaction with existing breakpoints.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% – addr, timeout, and instance_id are all documented in the schema, including the important multi-instance rule for instance_id. The description adds nothing beyond that, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb and resource ('run debugger to specific address'), which is clear enough to identify the operation. It stops short of distinguishing it from siblings such as dbg_continue or dbg_step_over, which an agent must infer from the name alone.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no statement of when to use this versus dbg_continue, dbg_step_over, or dbg_start, and no preconditions (e.g. that a debug session must already be started and stopped at a breakpoint). The agent gets no routing guidance from the description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.