Skip to main content
Glama

Dbg Status

dbg_status

Retrieves debugger status including state, PID, threads, and current instruction pointer for a selected IDA Pro instance, so you can monitor active debugging sessions.

Instructions

Get debugger status: state, pid, threads, current instruction pointer.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "dbg_status"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
timeoutNoTimeout in seconds
instance_idNoREQUIRED whenever more than one database is open (from open_database's result or list_databases()); optional only while exactly one instance is live.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.0.1
    • changedInput schema / properties / instance_id / description
      Previous value: -"Instance id override"New value: +"REQUIRED whenever more than one database is open (from open_database's result or list_databases()); optional only while exactly one instance is live."
  2. First observedv0.9.7

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full disclosure burden, and it discloses almost nothing beyond the fact that it reads. It does not say what happens if no debugger session is running, whether it blocks or errors, or whether it has any side effects on the target.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence, front-loaded with the verb and followed by a compact enumeration of returned fields. Nothing is wasted or buried.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The enumerated return fields partially compensate for the absence of an output schema, and the schema fully covers the inputs. What is missing is state-dependency information — an agent cannot tell from the description whether this requires dbg_start to have been called first.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and both parameters (timeout, instance_id) are documented in-schema, including the important multi-database constraint on instance_id. The description adds no parameter meaning of its own, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb and resource ('Get debugger status') and enumerates exactly what is returned: state, pid, threads, and instruction pointer. That field list usefully distinguishes it from narrower reads like dbg_regs or dbg_callstack, though it never names an alternative explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no statement of when to call this versus dbg_regs, dbg_callstack, or the other dbg_* tools, and no mention of prerequisites such as an active debug session. The only conditional guidance in the definition lives in the schema's instance_id field, not the description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.