BinanceWalletGetOpenSymbolList
Retrieve the list of currently open trading symbols to identify active Binance markets for trade execution.
Instructions
Get open symbol list.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve the list of currently open trading symbols to identify active Binance markets for trade execution.
Get open symbol list.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It does not state whether this is a read-only operation, what the response contains, or any side effects. The brief phrase 'Get open symbol list' offers no behavioral detail.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short, which is concise, but it is under-specified to the point of vagueness. It does not earn its place because it communicates almost nothing beyond the tool name.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and no annotations, the description should clarify what 'open symbol list' means and what the result looks like. It fails to provide enough context to understand the tool's purpose or differentiate it from similar-sounding tools.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, and the schema has no properties. The description does not need to explain parameters, and the baseline for zero parameters is 4, as there is nothing to add beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description says 'Get open symbol list.' which names a verb and resource but leaves 'open symbol' undefined. It could refer to trading symbols, open orders, or something else, and does not distinguish from siblings like BinanceGetOpenOrders or BinanceWalletGetSymbolsDelistScheduleForSpot.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of context, prerequisites, or exclusions, leaving the agent to guess.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/C0inFlips/binance-mcp-chainvector'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server