BinanceConvertPlaceLimitOrder

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears the full burden. It discloses the core mutation (placing a limit order) but omits behavioral context like order execution behavior, required permissions, potential rejections, or the fact that funds may be reserved. For a trading tool, this is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, front-loaded sentence conveys the core purpose without extraneous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite a rich schema, the tool has no output schema and no annotations. The description does not explain the response structure, order lifecycle, or integration with sibling tools like BinanceConvertOrderStatus or BinanceConvertCancelLimitOrder, leaving gaps for a complex 9-parameter order placement tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema descriptions cover all 9 parameters, so the baseline is 3. The description adds minimal relational semantics by noting 'either base or quote amount' and grouping wallet type and expiry, but this largely mirrors existing schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Places') and identifies the unique resource ('limit order to convert between two tokens'), clearly differentiating from general order tools like BinanceNewOrder and other convert workflow tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies its use case (placing a limit conversion order) but does not explicitly state when to choose this over alternatives such as BinanceNewOrder or when not to use it. No exclusions or alternative guidance is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.