BinanceHashRateResaleRequest

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose side effects. The word 'Retrieve' implies a read-only operation, but the required setup parameters suggest this actually creates or modifies a resale configuration. This is a serious behavioral ambiguity with no mention of permissions, reversibility, or return behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, so it is concise in length, but the phrasing is awkward and misleading. It is not as minimal as a tautology, but it fails to clearly convey the action, making it less effective than a well-structured sentence.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a complex tool with 7 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations. The description does not explain the actual operation (create vs. retrieve), the return value, prerequisites, or any behavioral details. It is severely incomplete for the complexity involved.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and each parameter has a clear description. The tool description adds little beyond listing the same parameters, so it stays at the baseline of 3. It does not enrich understanding of parameter relationships or constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description says 'Retrieve a request' but then lists parameters needed to set up a resale, suggesting this is actually a creation operation. It also does not distinguish from sibling tools like BinanceHashRateResaleDetail, which likely retrieves an existing request by ID.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With a large family of hash rate resale tools (List, Detail, Cancel), the description should clarify that this is for creating or retrieving a specific request, but it provides no such context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.