BinanceConvertQueryLimitOpenOrders

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It transparently indicates a read-only operation via 'Retrieves' and lists the output fields, giving a clear sense of what the tool does. It doesn't mention rate limits or pagination, but for a simple read query, the description provides adequate behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence that immediately states the main purpose and then lists key output details. No fluff or unnecessary information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that the tool has only one optional parameter, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is reasonably complete. It explains what the tool returns and the scope (open limit orders). It could mention that it requires authentication, but that is implied by the Binance tool family and is not a significant gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% (only recvWindow, with its own description). The tool description does not add any additional meaning about the parameter, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Retrieves') and clearly identifies the resource ('all your open limit orders for token conversions'). It also lists the returned details (assets, amounts, exchange rate, order status, expiration time), which distinguishes it from other order-related tools in the siblings list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is for viewing open conversion limit orders but doesn't explicitly state when to use it versus alternatives like BinanceConvertOrderStatus or BinanceGetOpenOrders. No exclusions or alternative tools are mentioned, so guidance is implied rather than explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.