mailchimp_campaigns_unschedule

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must carry the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states the action without explaining what happens to the campaign after unscheduling (e.g., reverting to draft, whether the scheduled send is permanently canceled, or if the operation is reversible). This minimal disclosure is insufficient for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence with no wasted words. It conveys the essential action and object efficiently, earning full marks for conciseness and structure.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the low complexity (one parameter, no output schema), the description is minimally sufficient, but it lacks context about the campaign's state transition or prerequisites. It does not explain what 'unschedule' entails beyond the action itself, making it adequate but with clear gaps in completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides 100% coverage for the single parameter 'campaign_id' with its description 'Campaign ID'. The tool description adds no additional parameter context beyond the schema, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'unschedule' with the resource 'campaign', clearly indicating the action of canceling a scheduled campaign. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like 'mailchimp_campaigns_schedule' and 'mailchimp_campaigns_send' by the explicit 'unschedule' action.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the campaign must be currently scheduled, but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'pause' or 'resume'. There are no stated exclusions or alternative recommendations, so usage is only implied rather than clearly directed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.