mailchimp_automations_list_emails

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It does not disclose that this is a read-only operation, any pagination behavior, or the structure of the returned data. The phrase 'Get all' suggests a complete list but does not clarify limits or additional API call requirements. This is a minimal disclosure with no extra behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that concisely states the action and scope. Every word is necessary, and it is appropriately sized for a simple one-parameter list tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple list tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description gives the essential purpose. However, it lacks context about return format, pagination, or any filtering capabilities. It is minimally viable but leaves room for uncertainty about the API response. Given the low complexity, a score of 3 is fair.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%: the only parameter 'workflow_id' is described as 'Automation workflow ID'. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, but since the schema fully documents the parameter, the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb+resource combination ('Get all emails in an automation workflow') and clearly distinguishes from sibling tools like 'mailchimp_automations_get_email' (single email) and 'mailchimp_automations_list' (list workflows). The scope is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Given the many sibling automation tools, it would be helpful to mention that this is for listing emails within a workflow, while 'get_email' is for a single email or 'list_queue' for queued emails. The usage context is only implied, with no exclusions or alternatives mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.