get_value_schema_version_infos

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must cover behavioral traits. It only states the action without disclosing side effects, authentication requirements, rate limits, or whether the operation is read-only. The output schema exists but is not referenced.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence. No unnecessary words, and the structure is appropriate for the tool's simplicity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the single parameter and existing output schema, the description provides the core purpose. However, it lacks context about what 'version information' entails (e.g., all versions, latest only) and how it differs from related tools, which is adequate but not thorough.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage, meaning the parameter 'topic_name' lacks any semantic details. The description adds minimal value by mentioning 'for a topic,' but does not explain valid formats, naming conventions, or how the parameter is used.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get value schema version information for a topic,' specifying the verb 'Get' and the resource 'value schema version information.' It distinguishes this tool from the sibling 'get_key_schema_version_infos' which operates on key schemas, and from 'get_schema_meta_for_topic' which retrieves schema metadata.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'get_key_schema_version_infos' or 'get_schema_meta_for_topic.' No context about prerequisites, limitations, or typical use cases is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.