get_all_topic_configs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It discloses no behavioral traits: no mention of permissions, data scope, cost, or side effects. A simple 'Get configurations for all topics' is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise (one sentence), which is generally positive. However, it is under-specified for a tool in a large sibling set, lacking necessary context. Could be expanded without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having no parameters and an output schema, the description fails to clarify scope (e.g., cluster context) or what constitutes a 'configuration'. In a large sibling set, more context is needed to distinguish and use correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters in input schema, so schema coverage is 100%. Baseline is 3. Description adds no information about parameters because none exist, so it meets the minimum.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description states 'Get configurations for all topics.' which clearly identifies the verb 'get' and resource 'configurations for all topics'. The use of 'all' helps distinguish it from siblings like 'get_topic_configs', but it does not explicitly differentiate from 'get_default_topic_configs'. Purpose is clear but could be more precise.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'get_topic_configs' or 'get_default_topic_configs'. The description provides no context on appropriate usage scenarios or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.