get_topic_offsets

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description must carry the full burden. The single sentence implies a read operation (common for 'get' tools), but it does not disclose any behavioral traits such as read-only nature, performance implications, or whether it requires special permissions. It is minimally transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence with no unnecessary words. However, it is too brief to be fully effective. It could be slightly expanded to include key details without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool (one parameter, output schema exists), the description should still provide context about what offset information is returned. It fails to do so, leaving the agent to infer from the tool name and output schema. The description is incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter 'topic_name' has no description in the schema (coverage 0%). The tool description adds no additional meaning, such as specifying valid formats, examples, or constraints. The agent must rely solely on the parameter name, which is insufficient for correct invocation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get offset information for a topic' clearly states the action (Get) and the resource (offset information for a topic). It distinguishes from sibling tools like reset_offset and other get_* tools by specifying offset information. However, it lacks detail on what exactly 'offset information' includes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines are provided. The description does not indicate when to use this tool vs alternatives, such as when to use reset_offset vs get_topic_offsets, or how it relates to other get_* tools. The agent receives no context for decision-making.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.