get_consumer_group_metrics

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states 'Get metrics' without mentioning whether it's read-only, idempotent, or what the response looks like. No information on pagination, data freshness, or error conditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence, but it is too brief for a tool with multiple parameters and many siblings. It could be slightly longer to include essential context without being verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (4 parameters, output schema present, many sibling tools), the description is insufficient. It does not mention the time range parameters, the type of metrics, or the output. The output schema exists but is not referenced.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description does not explain any parameter meaning. Schema coverage is 0%, so the schema itself lacks descriptions. The tool has 4 parameters (group_name required, duration, from_time, to_time) but the description adds no context about their purpose, format, or constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and resource 'metrics for a specific consumer group'. However, it does not distinguish this from sibling tools like 'get_all_consumer_group_metrics' or other metric tools, missing specificity about what metrics are included.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Lacks context such as prerequisites, typical use cases, or when not to use it. Compared to siblings like 'get_all_consumer_group_metrics', no differentiation is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.