get_cluster_with_topic_metrics

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states the tool gets metrics, without mentioning read-only nature, side effects, parameter effects, or any other behavior. This is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise at one sentence, but it sacrifices substance for brevity. It is front-loaded but lacks structure or additional helpful information. It is not overly verbose, but under-specification reduces its value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of 3 optional parameters, many sibling tools, and no annotations, the description is incomplete. It does not explain the output (despite having an output schema), parameter usage, or how this tool differs from similar ones.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has three parameters (duration, from_time, to_time) with zero documentation in the schema. The description does not explain their meaning or usage at all, leaving the agent without necessary context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool retrieves cluster metrics including topic metrics, which is a specific verb-resource combination. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like 'get_cluster_with_broker_metrics' or 'get_cluster_details', limiting clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'get_cluster_with_broker_metrics' or 'get_topic_metrics'. No exclusions or context for usage are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.