Skip to main content
Glama

generate_comprehensive_test_data

Create synthetic test data for Cliniko practice management systems to validate workflows across patients, appointments, invoices, and clinical records.

Instructions

Generate comprehensive synthetic test data across all Cliniko categories

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
num_patientsNo
num_contactsNo
num_relationshipsNo
num_appointmentsNo
num_past_appointmentsNo
num_group_appointmentsNo
num_treatment_notesNo
num_medical_alertsNo
num_patient_casesNo
num_invoicesNo
num_productsNo
num_paymentsNo
days_aheadNo
days_pastNo
test_domainNotest.cliniko.com

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description does not disclose side effects (e.g., that it creates real records requiring cleanup), auth needs, or rate limits. Only states it generates test data.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One efficient sentence, no wasted words; but lacks crucial details, making it feel under-specified rather than concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 15 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, description is extremely incomplete. Fails to explain return values, categories covered, side effects, or relationship to cleanup tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but description adds no parameter information. Parameter names are self-explanatory, but description should compensate for lack of schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool generates comprehensive synthetic test data across all Cliniko categories, distinguishing it from siblings like generate_test_data which may be less comprehensive.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this vs. generate_test_data or other tools. Implies usage for comprehensive test generation but lacks when not to use or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.