getMachineById
Retrieve details about a specific machine, such as its item and move, using its unique ID.
Instructions
Get information about a machine by its ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The ID of the machine. |
Retrieve details about a specific machine, such as its item and move, using its unique ID.
Get information about a machine by its ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The ID of the machine. |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. The description does not disclose any behavioral traits beyond the basic retrieval, such as error handling, permissions, or response format. Minimal value added.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, 9 words, front-loaded with the core purpose. No wasted or redundant information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple get-by-ID tool, the description is adequate. It covers the essential usage without needing extensive behavioral details, especially given the straightforward parameter schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema covers the single parameter with a description. The described parameter semantics are redundant with the schema, adding no extra meaning. Baseline 3 due to 100% schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (get), resource (machine), and identifier method (by ID). It is specific and distinguishes itself from sibling tools that are mostly by name.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like getMachineByName (if it existed). Sibling tools are all similar get*ByName/ById, but no explicit context or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Asthanaji05/MCP_Pokemon'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server