getEggGroupByName
Retrieve detailed information about a Pokémon egg group by providing its name.
Instructions
Get information about an egg group by its name.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | The name of the egg group. |
Retrieve detailed information about a Pokémon egg group by providing its name.
Get information about an egg group by its name.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | The name of the egg group. |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits beyond the basic 'Get information'. It does not specify side effects, permissions, or return format, leaving the agent with incomplete transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence that is front-loaded and contains no unnecessary words. Every word earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple lookup tool with one required parameter and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. However, without annotations or details on return values, completeness is moderate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% for the single parameter 'name'. The description does not add additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (Get), the resource (egg group), and the lookup method (by name). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools by specifying the unique resource.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings. The context is implied by the resource name, but no exclusions or alternatives are mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Asthanaji05/MCP_Pokemon'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server